| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Greetings all, |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
As all potential new eclasses are supposed to be discussed here, I |
| 7 |
thought I'd file a message and see if anyone had anything to |
| 8 |
contribute on the matter. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I'm in the midst of a major version bump for the entirety of the MATE |
| 11 |
desktop environment, consisting of 40-50 packages. There is a huge |
| 12 |
amount of repetition in my ebuilds, and a lot of things are formulaic |
| 13 |
(SRC_URI, HOMEPAGE, EGIT_REPO_URI, inherits, src_prepare, etc). As |
| 14 |
such, I think that moving all of that to an eclass would greatly |
| 15 |
simplify my life and my ebuilds, so I thought I'd look into creating |
| 16 |
an eclass. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Any opinions either way? Thanks in advance. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
- -- |
| 22 |
NP-Hardass |
| 23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 24 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXCzGLAAoJEBzZQR2yrxj7knsP/AyP3yREWCEuw/k2IbAw987y |
| 27 |
QM78PN1u1IYA1YtP1IDFyOd91aGuIqwtURdoY6zq7ExBA8/5nftMHalgz5kfUyFn |
| 28 |
lXhe5ZYsnFUAMIJHrsdECFdRbK7RfYYraEZSRyPs4kZJjUrg4PLiFuJIy8ITzq5p |
| 29 |
Ul7hD8pFIEMpgEmWly/cJ5G7Eatl8A8OgJW9LAYOxDDFdNX1xvzP0VQhRE9lBE7u |
| 30 |
SiVPI+iTwH5yIM4KDpKPGvsCOR82ijj661IMFa/sJdZdwWPmtf8LRQb12CMk/Yjr |
| 31 |
YheUgamZ88KC4zd55mLotZGi7g71Lof7IRByzOO5VsWRpW5h9vm+ivVLLI72fj9W |
| 32 |
88lmmvJ6f/Pw1w8WXeX/D8wN4PE6veD8Y/O/P3czIi1zXQM+IRZhJmoxpCiQng93 |
| 33 |
fXdLd2h0o2ntx1qsubIHU/fiakz8RZtsO0zQbYdrvC+YV2+IJTuKfco8YyWgiNul |
| 34 |
PsWuVCcM8cjVVIbk10Ny93MLEkhM2DvUsu35imFfJzIU1eCFo9PtD3YEOzqStNuB |
| 35 |
uNeOZi5PAhWllJCVgNkO2a0hXpA/N24a0TUh5CFS2y/rZ7BH3ydGVg8D0nkwx4dV |
| 36 |
2f6/ydR2cNmLckPVdfrXljFgE8vDLrobZaBWvyxbQqyslLbb684Js5KjH9T1fgPt |
| 37 |
7ibouuaYZ80U+FiL4mtu |
| 38 |
=/7NT |
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives