| 1 |
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:36:05 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > These are the rules for a machine. People don't actually read |
| 5 |
> > dependencies sequentially. Provide a good algorithm which works from |
| 6 |
> > any position. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Read backwards from the current position until you find a label. It's |
| 9 |
> the same algorithm you use to find out what the current section is |
| 10 |
> when you're reading an article. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
No, it doesn't work that way. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
See: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
foo? ( |
| 17 |
label: |
| 18 |
dev-foo/bar |
| 19 |
) |
| 20 |
dev-bar/foo <- |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Reading backwards, I find 'label'. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> > shall we repeat all the disadvantages which you love to forgot to |
| 25 |
> > mention? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> No, please stay out of this until you understand the original |
| 28 |
> proposal, and in particular the parts marked with ***. So long as you |
| 29 |
> don't understand what we're discussing, I'm afraid any contributions |
| 30 |
> you make will simply be shouting and waving. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
What have parts marked with '***' to do with the disadvantages we have |
| 33 |
already proved and which you didn't even bother answering? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Best regards, |
| 37 |
Michał Górny |
Archives