1 |
On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 11:02, Sebastian Werner wrote: |
2 |
> GConf for example don't depend on so many libs. I think the only not |
3 |
> system-lib is glib. But this lib is used also by env-update. So no big |
4 |
> problem. Good, the rescue Problem I agree. But it is much faster. Really |
5 |
|
6 |
Does it? To my knowledge env-update relies on nothing else but bash and |
7 |
python, note that this it a statically compiled version of python which |
8 |
doesn't need any system libs. Maybe I'm overlooking something though. |
9 |
|
10 |
> cool could it be to store all settings from /etc in binary files. But |
11 |
> that is not your way and not very fsh-compatible - I know. But it could |
12 |
> be a general idea. I don't like to have 100 files which don't follow the |
13 |
> same style. This is not very user-friendly. |
14 |
|
15 |
How could you possible unify the style of all the configuration files? |
16 |
This means that you'd have to track all the config formats of all |
17 |
libraries and applications together with their options and write a |
18 |
unified wrapper interface on top of them. I really can't see the benefit |
19 |
of that, and I don't dare to imagine the sheer nightmare of trying to |
20 |
maintain and update this. |
21 |
|
22 |
> Some other idea is to use the sheme of ksyscoca (like KDE-2.2). It reads |
23 |
> text files and builds a binary cache. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Sebastian |
26 |
-- |
27 |
Geert Bevin |
28 |
the Leaf sprl/bvba |
29 |
"Use what you need" Pierre Theunisstraat 1/47 |
30 |
http://www.theleaf.be 1030 Brussels |
31 |
gbevin@×××××××.be Tel & Fax +32 2 241 19 98 |