| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 12/08/15 02:18 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 5 |
> On 12/08/15 02:00 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>>> pkg_pretend() { if use qt4; then required_use -qt5 else |
| 9 |
>>>> required_use qt5 fi } |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>>> And how would the PM understand that -qt5 is conditional |
| 12 |
>>> upon qt4? Such knowledge is required if it's supposed to |
| 13 |
>>> auto-resolve stuff... |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>> Right, the above was too simple (and wrong). It should have |
| 16 |
>> been: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
>> pkg_pretend() { use qt4 && use qt5 && required_use -qt5 use |
| 19 |
>> qt4 || use qt5 || required_use qt4 } |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I think Ciaran's point was more, if required_use is going to |
| 23 |
> i.e. elog, it needs to elog that qt4 is being enabled because |
| 24 |
> neither-of qt4 or qt5 are *ON*, and similarly for why qt5 is |
| 25 |
> being disabled. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
^^^ corrected logic |
| 28 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 29 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlXLjh8ACgkQAJxUfCtlWe3TTAEAuJPVQQ9yoWBeBTRH2AFnFZoW |
| 32 |
3aWWdhmClQRMo3MI43IBANkaRZOtWHhnWi31wvK+Pw0GvzkAmzEaWOFS7YxxWORO |
| 33 |
=ccVT |
| 34 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives