| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 12/08/15 02:00 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>>>> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
>>> pkg_pretend() { if use qt4; then required_use -qt5 else |
| 8 |
>>> required_use qt5 fi } |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>> And how would the PM understand that -qt5 is conditional upon |
| 11 |
>> qt4? Such knowledge is required if it's supposed to |
| 12 |
>> auto-resolve stuff... |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Right, the above was too simple (and wrong). It should have |
| 15 |
> been: |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> pkg_pretend() { use qt4 && use qt5 && required_use -qt5 use qt4 |
| 18 |
> || use qt5 || required_use qt4 } |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I think Ciaran's point was more, if required_use is going to i.e. |
| 22 |
elog, it needs to elog that qt4 is being enabled because neither-of |
| 23 |
qt4 or qt5 are off, and similarly for why qt5 is being disabled. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 27 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlXLjdwACgkQAJxUfCtlWe3K6QD+L3kdVxSIJDp3N+wBZEtuhtNT |
| 30 |
5kT7NXTdXuubE4Dgv7wA/1auz4k+rYQDZP7DP+i/JsHA/RMhOgUt7yc5a0H8yYHS |
| 31 |
=FXa+ |
| 32 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives