1 |
Am Samstag, den 25.05.2013, 15:53 -0400 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: |
2 |
> On 05/25/2013 02:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
3 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
4 |
> > Hash: SHA512 |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
7 |
> >> But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then |
8 |
> >> working together becomes quite difficult. In this case I opted to |
9 |
> >> give up maintainership. |
10 |
> >> |
11 |
> > Ben, |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > We've been working together, in the same team(s), for more than 4 |
14 |
> > years and we never had a single problem in co-maintaining packages. I |
15 |
> > would never expected you to make so much noise because I committed a |
16 |
> > file (yes a file, *not* a patch) that changes absolutely *nothing* to |
17 |
> > existing users but it helps all those users who want to use systemd. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> > I am very disappointed and confused. |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > You should have known me better by now. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > - -- |
24 |
> > Regards, |
25 |
> > Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
26 |
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> |
29 |
> We are moving too quickly on bug #448882 ([Tracker] packages not |
30 |
> providing systemd units). We should come to better consensus on systemd |
31 |
> integration and we were getting there with the idea of INSTALL_MASK. I |
32 |
> don't know that it is a working solution yet. I have to oppose adding |
33 |
> unit files unless we have a way to opt out for reasons I gave earlier, |
34 |
> regarding embedded systems where one needs to conserve space |
35 |
> aggressively. And we may have found a way to do so without cluttering |
36 |
> ebuilds with USE flags. |
37 |
|
38 |
Even though I don't care about a couple of files more on my FS I would |
39 |
prefer to find a solution with functions provided by PMS, not portage |
40 |
alone. |
41 |
|
42 |
> |
43 |
> Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting |
44 |
> out? I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I |
45 |
> would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test. |
46 |
> |
47 |
|
48 |
Maybe we have to find a more generic solution for this, because there is |
49 |
bug #235944 [1] which request extra config snippets for rsyslog added to |
50 |
various packages. Or is this something different? If yes, how? |
51 |
|
52 |
Best, |
53 |
Tiziano |
54 |
|
55 |
|
56 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235944 |