| 1 |
Am Samstag, den 25.05.2013, 15:53 -0400 schrieb Anthony G. Basile: |
| 2 |
> On 05/25/2013 02:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> > Hash: SHA512 |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > On 05/25/2013 05:14 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> But if a co-maintainer pushes through a change that I oppose, then |
| 8 |
> >> working together becomes quite difficult. In this case I opted to |
| 9 |
> >> give up maintainership. |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> > Ben, |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > We've been working together, in the same team(s), for more than 4 |
| 14 |
> > years and we never had a single problem in co-maintaining packages. I |
| 15 |
> > would never expected you to make so much noise because I committed a |
| 16 |
> > file (yes a file, *not* a patch) that changes absolutely *nothing* to |
| 17 |
> > existing users but it helps all those users who want to use systemd. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > I am very disappointed and confused. |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > You should have known me better by now. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > - -- |
| 24 |
> > Regards, |
| 25 |
> > Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 26 |
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> We are moving too quickly on bug #448882 ([Tracker] packages not |
| 30 |
> providing systemd units). We should come to better consensus on systemd |
| 31 |
> integration and we were getting there with the idea of INSTALL_MASK. I |
| 32 |
> don't know that it is a working solution yet. I have to oppose adding |
| 33 |
> unit files unless we have a way to opt out for reasons I gave earlier, |
| 34 |
> regarding embedded systems where one needs to conserve space |
| 35 |
> aggressively. And we may have found a way to do so without cluttering |
| 36 |
> ebuilds with USE flags. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Even though I don't care about a couple of files more on my FS I would |
| 39 |
prefer to find a solution with functions provided by PMS, not portage |
| 40 |
alone. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
> Can I ask the systemd people to design a working solution for opting |
| 44 |
> out? I can't support this initiative without such a solution and I |
| 45 |
> would be happy to work with the systemd people to reach it, ie I'll test. |
| 46 |
> |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
Maybe we have to find a more generic solution for this, because there is |
| 49 |
bug #235944 [1] which request extra config snippets for rsyslog added to |
| 50 |
various packages. Or is this something different? If yes, how? |
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
Best, |
| 53 |
Tiziano |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235944 |
Archives