Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gems.eclass review
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:04:26
Message-Id: 1237053765.31719.4696.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gems.eclass review by Alex Legler
1 В Чтв, 12/03/2009 в 21:02 +0100, Alex Legler пишет:
2 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.txt
3 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.diff
4
5 You have:
6
7 EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_prepare src_configure src_compile src_install
8
9 I'm not sure here. Is it safe to export src_prepare function for
10 EAPI=0,1? If not I think eclass should either die or put some fake
11 depend like:
12
13 case ${EAPI} in
14 2) : ;;
15 *) DEPEND="INCORRECT-EAPI" ;;
16 esac
17
18 --
19 Peter.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gems.eclass review Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>