| 1 |
Dnia 2014-07-27, o godz. 14:42:24 |
| 2 |
Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) |
| 7 |
> > Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 8 |
> >> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 9 |
> >>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g. |
| 10 |
> >>> when subslots are in use) |
| 11 |
> >> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken. |
| 12 |
> > Yes they are. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision |
| 15 |
> bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs] |
| 16 |
> to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev |
| 17 |
> Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
How did you exactly test them? Did you at least bother checking if |
| 20 |
portage actually uses the deps you added? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
Archives