1 |
On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) |
3 |
> Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
>> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g. |
6 |
>>> when subslots are in use) |
7 |
>> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken. |
8 |
> Yes they are. |
9 |
|
10 |
We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision |
11 |
bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs] |
12 |
to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev |
13 |
Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. Nobody has filed bugs at |
14 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/, nobody has filed a single forums post, |
15 |
nobody has said anything at #gentoo, Freenode |
16 |
Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related packages, |
17 |
simple-scan and something else |
18 |
|
19 |
So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. |
20 |
|
21 |
People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take |
22 |
those races anyday over an regression that causes |
23 |
endless rebuilding... |
24 |
|
25 |
- Samuli |