| 1 |
Samuli Suominen: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) |
| 5 |
>> Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 6 |
>>> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
>>>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g. |
| 8 |
>>>> when subslots are in use) |
| 9 |
>>> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken. |
| 10 |
>> Yes they are. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision |
| 13 |
> bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs] |
| 14 |
> to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev |
| 15 |
> Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. Nobody has filed bugs at |
| 16 |
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/, nobody has filed a single forums post, |
| 17 |
> nobody has said anything at #gentoo, Freenode |
| 18 |
> Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related packages, |
| 19 |
> simple-scan and something else |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take |
| 24 |
> those races anyday over an regression that causes |
| 25 |
> endless rebuilding... |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support |
| 29 |
on most of those converted ebuilds. |
Archives