1 |
On 27/07/14 14:50, hasufell wrote: |
2 |
> Samuli Suominen: |
3 |
>> On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 +0000 (UTC) |
5 |
>>> Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
6 |
>>>> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
7 |
>>>>> Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g. |
8 |
>>>>> when subslots are in use) |
9 |
>>>> Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are not broken. |
10 |
>>> Yes they are. |
11 |
>> We just succesfully converted ~300 ebuilds in tree without revision |
12 |
>> bumps from virtual/udev[gudev,introspection,static-libs] |
13 |
>> to virtual/libudev and virtual/libgudev |
14 |
>> Tested it on multiple boxes, went fine. Nobody has filed bugs at |
15 |
>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/, nobody has filed a single forums post, |
16 |
>> nobody has said anything at #gentoo, Freenode |
17 |
>> Only one person said he had to manually build 2 GNOME related packages, |
18 |
>> simple-scan and something else |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> So, broken? Far from it. More like essential feature. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> People have just listed some known races dynamic deps have, and I take |
23 |
>> those races anyday over an regression that causes |
24 |
>> endless rebuilding... |
25 |
>> |
26 |
> I'm not sure if you realize that you just disabled dynamic deps support |
27 |
> on most of those converted ebuilds. |
28 |
> |
29 |
|
30 |
There is a bug in the package manager, you mean. |