Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: versionator.eclass terminator, was [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:42:24
Message-Id: 200905181742.21333.rbu@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: versionator.eclass terminator, was [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated by Jeroen Roovers
1 On Monday 18 May 2009, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
2 > On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:16:46 +0100
3 >
4 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
5 > > Why do you think I wrote the awful hack that is versionator?
6 >
7 > Why don't you explain why, historically, you put that in the tree? It
8 > would help us now if you were to simply record your mistakes for
9 > everybody else to easily avoid. It's still being used in the tree and
10 > should be discouraged.
11
12 I'm not following. Why should it be discouraged?
13 I was happy with it until now.
14
15 Robert

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: versionator.eclass terminator, was [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>