Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: versionator.eclass terminator, was [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:28:03
Message-Id: 20090518172800.7576c34a@epia.jer-c2.orkz.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:16:46 +0100
2 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > Why do you think I wrote the awful hack that is versionator?
5
6 Why don't you explain why, historically, you put that in the tree? It
7 would help us now if you were to simply record your mistakes for
8 everybody else to easily avoid. It's still being used in the tree and
9 should be discouraged.
10
11 > Anything that finally lets us kill that off has to be good...
12
13 Loosening VERSION requirements won't fix the problem. This will:
14
15 1) Discourage its use by putting a QA ewarn in the eclass.
16 2) Have all ebuilds converted either through QA bugs or a nice Saturday
17 afternoon coding spree.
18 3) Announce its removal.
19 4) Remove.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: versionator.eclass terminator, was [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: versionator.eclass terminator, was [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 55 updated Robert Buchholz <rbu@g.o>