| 1 |
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:02:29 +0400 |
| 2 |
Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> 22.10.2013 07:19, Peter Stuge пишет: |
| 5 |
> > I should have included bugzilla among mailing lists+IRC, users can |
| 6 |
> > indeed also have elevated privileges on IRC, but never equal to |
| 7 |
> > developers. It is radical exclusion and I'm reminded of it every |
| 8 |
> > time the #gentoo-dev channel mode catches my eye, painfully so if |
| 9 |
> > there's a discussion I could perhaps contribute to. Most of the time |
| 10 |
> > it is easy enough to say something privately to a relevant |
| 11 |
> > developer, but that's still very different from actual |
| 12 |
> > participation. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Yes, and i think that it was done for a reason. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Now I wonder if the +m on IRC was set proactively or reactively. If the |
| 18 |
former it could be worth a try to -m. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> But nobody stops you |
| 21 |
> from requesting temporarily voice on #gentoo-dev and when you |
| 22 |
> contributions will be marked as significant - gentoo/contributor |
| 23 |
> cloak, that will give you permanent voice in #gentoo-dev. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> You should understand that #gentoo-dev is channel for developer's |
| 26 |
> communication primarily and it is not so restricted, as you think. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> For example, #gentoo-infra is totally restricted to developers only, |
| 29 |
> other interested parties should be added to channel ACLs explicitly or |
| 30 |
> should get invite there. |
Archives