Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org, gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again)
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:05:40
Message-Id: 20050227230533.GA4624@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) by Simon Stelling
1 maillog: 27/02/2005-18:18:27(+0100): Simon Stelling types
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 > >How about we recognise that individual ebuilds aren't worth anything
6 > >and that the tree *as a whole* should be copyrighted as a single work?
7 > >
8 > ># This file is part of the Gentoo Portage tree, which is Copyright (c)
9 > ># 1999-2005 Gentoo Foundation, and distributed under the terms of the
10 > ># GNU GPL v2.
11 >
12 > Sounds good to me, but what about the patches in ${FILESDIR}?
13
14 What patches? Are there still patches in FILESDIR?
15
16 --
17 | Georgi Georgiev | Courtship to marriage, as a very witty |
18 | chutz@×××.net | prologue to a very dull play. -- William |
19 | +81(90)6266-1163 | Congreve |
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o>