Archives
Archives
| From: | Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) | ||
| Date: | Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:18:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | 422200E3.6090307@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | Hi, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 | > How about we recognise that individual ebuilds aren't worth anything |
| 5 | > and that the tree *as a whole* should be copyrighted as a single work? |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > # This file is part of the Gentoo Portage tree, which is Copyright (c) |
| 8 | > # 1999-2005 Gentoo Foundation, and distributed under the terms of the |
| 9 | > # GNU GPL v2. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Sounds good to me, but what about the patches in ${FILESDIR}? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Greetings, |
| 14 | |
| 15 | blubb |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Copyright assignment and ownership (again) | Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net> |