Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] ruby-ng.eclass: Include (-) in RUBY_TARGETS USE-dependencies

[Luca Barbato]

On 03/01/2020 23:34, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote:
>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
>>> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
>>>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass
>>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() {
>>>>>>   	local res=
>>>>>>   	for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do
>>>>>>   		has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \
>>>>>> -			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
>>>>>> ntation}?,"
>>>>>> +			res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme
>>>>>> ntation}(-)?,"
>>>>>>   	done
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   	echo "[${res%,}]"
>>>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer
>>>>> used
>>>>> since 2010?
>>>>>
>>>> You did.  However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the
>>>> eclass
>>>> maintainer to take care of removing public API.  I have no clue if
>>>> Ruby
>>>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it.
>>>>
>>> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?!
>>> </sarcasm>*
>>>
>>> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit
>>>
>> Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless
>> chatter?
>>
>>
> Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't
> successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for
> developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this....
>

Hi, at least a person is displeased with your attempt at humor, could 
you please stop doing this? It does not add anything to the conversation 
and it is unpleasant.

lu

PS: This counts as friendly warning.