| 1 |
On 03/01/20 10:36, David Seifert wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:54 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 02/01/20 21:08, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 21:15 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2020, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> --- a/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass |
| 7 |
>>>>> +++ b/eclass/ruby-ng.eclass |
| 8 |
>>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ ruby_samelib() { |
| 9 |
>>>>> local res= |
| 10 |
>>>>> for _ruby_implementation in $(_ruby_get_all_impls); do |
| 11 |
>>>>> has -${_ruby_implementation} $@ || \ |
| 12 |
>>>>> - res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme |
| 13 |
>>>>> ntation}?," |
| 14 |
>>>>> + res="${res}ruby_targets_${_ruby_impleme |
| 15 |
>>>>> ntation}(-)?," |
| 16 |
>>>>> done |
| 17 |
>>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>>> echo "[${res%,}]" |
| 19 |
>>>> Hadn't we established that ruby_samelib() is dead code, no longer |
| 20 |
>>>> used |
| 21 |
>>>> since 2010? |
| 22 |
>>>> |
| 23 |
>>> You did. However, it isn't marked as private API and I'm not the |
| 24 |
>>> eclass |
| 25 |
>>> maintainer to take care of removing public API. I have no clue if |
| 26 |
>>> Ruby |
| 27 |
>>> project doesn't have some secret overlays using it. |
| 28 |
>>> |
| 29 |
>> <sarcasm> You can't use QA super-powerz ?! BDFL + sub-BDFL ?! |
| 30 |
>> </sarcasm>* |
| 31 |
>> |
| 32 |
>> * Thought the tags probably worth making explicit |
| 33 |
>> |
| 34 |
> Can you please stop polluting the -dev mailing list with this senseless |
| 35 |
> chatter? |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
Perhaps I should remind you that this is a public mailing list (or hasn't |
| 39 |
successfully been censored Yet) and not a private communication channel for |
| 40 |
developers (see -core for this). But I don't need to tell you this.... |
Archives