| 1 |
Peter Volkov kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
> В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет: |
| 3 |
>> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: |
| 4 |
>>> On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Peter Volkov kirjoitti: |
| 6 |
>>>>> Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge |
| 7 |
>>>>> libdts? |
| 8 |
>>>> Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to |
| 9 |
>>>> another. |
| 10 |
>>> unless they had a block in place ... |
| 11 |
>>> -mike |
| 12 |
>> When you move a package over an another the files don't change. So |
| 13 |
>> Portage thinks you have libdca installed but the files are from libdts. |
| 14 |
>> So every depending on libdca would have to have their atoms in such a |
| 15 |
>> way that doesn't match libdts existing versions. Please correct me if I |
| 16 |
>> am wrong. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Thank you, now I see. And if I understood correctly to fix atoms you |
| 19 |
> just have to add >=media-libs/libdca-0.0.5 into DEPEND of packages which |
| 20 |
> depend only on libdca. After this package move will work as it should. |
| 21 |
> Did I miss anything? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
This requirement would always have to be used and people writing ebuilds |
| 25 |
a year from now aren't very likely to know about the move history so |
| 26 |
it's better not to use package moves for situations like this. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Regards, |
| 29 |
Petteri |
Archives