| 1 |
В Пнд, 14/01/2008 в 02:10 +0200, Petteri Räty пишет: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger kirjoitti: |
| 3 |
> > On Sunday 13 January 2008, Petteri Räty wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> Peter Volkov kirjoitti: |
| 5 |
> >>> Also why not just do package move for libdts to avoid manual unmerge |
| 6 |
> >>> libdts? |
| 7 |
> >> Package moves don't work very well if you move an existing package to |
| 8 |
> >> another. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > unless they had a block in place ... |
| 11 |
> > -mike |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> When you move a package over an another the files don't change. So |
| 14 |
> Portage thinks you have libdca installed but the files are from libdts. |
| 15 |
> So every depending on libdca would have to have their atoms in such a |
| 16 |
> way that doesn't match libdts existing versions. Please correct me if I |
| 17 |
> am wrong. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Thank you, now I see. And if I understood correctly to fix atoms you |
| 20 |
just have to add >=media-libs/libdca-0.0.5 into DEPEND of packages which |
| 21 |
depend only on libdca. After this package move will work as it should. |
| 22 |
Did I miss anything? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Mike, how blocks help here? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Peter. |
Archives