1 |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:58 PM Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> What Copyright-owner header are you talking about? |
4 |
|
5 |
We would create one, just as we've created bugzilla tags in git for |
6 |
closing bugs/etc. Surely putting one line in a commit is no more |
7 |
difficult than putting one file in a repository? Indeed anybody can |
8 |
start sticking such a tag in commits today without any involvement |
9 |
from anybody else. |
10 |
|
11 |
> You've been the |
12 |
> most outspoken opponent of using what appears to be the standard |
13 |
> attribution form specified in GLEP-76 |
14 |
|
15 |
When have I been opposed to anything in GLEP 76? I'll admit that I |
16 |
don't 100% agree with everything in there, but I'm fine with following |
17 |
the GLEP as it is written. Multi-line copyright notices aren't in |
18 |
there, and the intent was never to be accumulating copyright holders |
19 |
on the single notice line. An authors file was a compromise I wasn't |
20 |
a huge fan of, but I'm suggesting that if we have one it ought to be |
21 |
auto-generated (presumably with the work being done by somebody who |
22 |
actually wants the file to be there). |
23 |
|
24 |
Also, GLEP 76 as it is written says: "Projects using this scheme must |
25 |
track authorship in a VCS, unless they list all authors of |
26 |
copyrightable contributions in an AUTHORS file." |
27 |
|
28 |
So, a VCS is the PREFERRED way of doing it. The alternative is |
29 |
listing ALL authors in the authors file. Right now it seems like |
30 |
people are advocating for only listing some authors. |
31 |
|
32 |
> I know mailing list debates are your personal pastime but this is a |
33 |
> real wasteoftime. |
34 |
|
35 |
You're the one advocating for changing the status quo. I'm happy if |
36 |
we drop the whole topic entirely. You certainly can't point fingers |
37 |
at others when you're proposing doing something differently. We |
38 |
wouldn't be having this discussion if some contributors were unwilling |
39 |
to contribute under our current standards. |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
Rich |