1 |
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 9:49 AM Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:59 AM Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 7:41 AM Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> > > It makes sense to ensure that the solution actually solves the problem |
7 |
> > > before we simply implement it. |
8 |
> > > |
9 |
> > > If we really need such a file it would probably also make more sense |
10 |
> > > to have it auto-generated from git commit headers |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > And how do you want to determine whether William's contributions are |
13 |
> > copyright Sony or now? Do you want to look up his timezone and check |
14 |
> > whether they were made during work hours? |
15 |
> |
16 |
> No, you look at the Copyright-owner header or whatever we want to call |
17 |
> it, and use that. Companies that care about labeling what they own |
18 |
> can take the time to properly document this. |
19 |
|
20 |
What Copyright-owner header are you talking about? You've been the |
21 |
most outspoken opponent of using what appears to be the standard |
22 |
attribution form specified in GLEP-76, and now that we have what I |
23 |
think is a really good compromise you're against that too? |
24 |
|
25 |
I know mailing list debates are your personal pastime but this is a |
26 |
real wasteoftime. |