| 1 |
Wednesday, 13. June 2007, Daniel Gryniewicz Ви написали: |
| 2 |
> > The first option will trigger portage errors and prompt users to open |
| 3 |
> > bugs until we have a stable 1.4, the second gives us a chance to explain |
| 4 |
> > the issue. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Any alternatives? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> 3. Mask < 1.4 on the 19th with a descriptive message. That should have |
| 9 |
> the effect of 1 and 2, without breaking anything necessarily? |
| 10 |
I'd say mask < 1. as soon as anything 1.4 hits the tree (even p-masekd). This |
| 11 |
way we warn users but also give them a chance to save a local copy of their |
| 12 |
favorite version. *We* cannot mirror sources, but as I understand, nothing |
| 13 |
prohibits end users from saving their stuff locally. Is this right? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Yes, this would be against any policy we have, but then the whole situation is |
| 16 |
kind of against anything that was ever considered when policies were |
| 17 |
developed.. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
George |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives