Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: PowerPC Resources at OSU
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:43:13
Message-Id: 20170912164302.GA21767@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: PowerPC Resources at OSU by R0b0t1
1 On 17-09-12 10:44:42, R0b0t1 wrote:
2 > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:29 PM, R0b0t1 <r030t1@×××××.com> wrote:
3 > > Hello,
4 > >
5 > > (This will be almost a duplicate on the PPC list, but now having more
6 > > information I am sending it to the BSD list as well.)
7 > >
8 > > I apologize in advance if I did anything improper. I misunderstood
9 > > desultory when I asked him what to do earlier. Originally I was
10 > > unwilling to try to associate myself with Gentoo for the purpose of
11 > > this request but I wasn't referred to anyone who could fill out the
12 > > form "for" me.
13 > >
14 > > Having requested OpenPOWER hosting from OSUOSL on Gentoo's behalf, I
15 > > was informed that hosting is already provided to the project.
16 > > Consequently I have two questions:
17 > >
18 > > 1) May I have access to a/the POWER server, or some other suitable
19 > > POWER resource? If not,
20 > > 2) is anyone available to verify that I am associated with the project
21 > > or that I will use the resources for project related work?
22 > >
23 > >
24 > > For any comment to OSU, such as to request closure of the ticket or
25 > > that they go ahead with allocating the VM, please comment and I will
26 > > forward the support ticket to you.
27 > >
28 > >
29 > > My intent is to experiment with the PowerPC architecture, specifically
30 > > features found on newer POWER processors and servers. It is unlikely I
31 > > will ever get to do this on my own as the machines run $10k-$30k. I
32 > > requested services from OSU because GCC was not able to accommodate my
33 > > request for hypervisor access on their system.
34 > >
35 > > However, having finally found the resources I've been looking for this
36 > > whole time, it looks like OSU's nodes are virtualized and won't be
37 > > able to do exactly what I want anyway (i.e. the GCC sysadmin was
38 > > misinformed), so I may have accidentally wasted people's time and
39 > > potentially tarnished Gentoo's reputation. I will make amends as best
40 > > I can.
41 > >
42 > > IBM is willing to fund a node for my use and OSU is willing to deploy
43 > > it pending contact from Gentoo leadership. If there is a machine that
44 > > already exists that I would not disrupt, I would have no problems
45 > > working on existing resources instead if that seems reasonable. The
46 > > GCC server(s) are probably adequate, however I am having lots of
47 > > problems setting up a prefix on those systems because they use CentOS.
48 > > I am trying to fix bugs as best as I am able but it is starting to
49 > > look hopeless.
50 > >
51 > > Excess resources on the donated OSU OpenPOWER machine could be offered
52 > > to other developers or used to run a Tinderbox. It may be a good idea
53 > > to do those things on the already existing machine(s).
54 > >
55 > > Respectfully,
56 > > R0b0t1
57 >
58 > I am in no great hurry to get things moving and don't mind being told
59 > "no," but at a certain point I feel like I will have to tell OSU that
60 > I couldn't figure out who controls their current donation.
61 >
62 > Respectfully,
63 > R0b0t1
64 >
65
66 I have access to it (can spin up servers and whatnot), but it doesn't
67 sound like that's what you are looking for (needing a non-virtualized
68 system). What specific features are you looking for?
69
70 Are you looking for rack space to put a donated IBM system in or what?
71 I'm not certian what you are looking for.
72
73 I'm on irc (as prometheanfire) if you want to talk.
74
75 --
76 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature