| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wednesday 20 August 2003 11:25 pm, Stewart Honsberger wrote: |
| 5 |
> The selection of Nano seems to be rather arbitrary. Why not Joe, Pico or |
| 6 |
> any of the other simple, user-friendly editors? |
| 7 |
Stewart: |
| 8 |
IMHO I do not consider Joe or Pico user friendly. I tried editing a file with |
| 9 |
them having never before used ethier one of them as well as having never used |
| 10 |
Vi(m) or emacs. I was not able to successfully edit the file. I opened nano |
| 11 |
for the first time and was able to edit the file with no problem. |
| 12 |
- -- |
| 13 |
Ralph |
| 14 |
================================================== |
| 15 |
Gentoo Linux: Gentoo Base System version 1.4.3.8p1 |
| 16 |
kernel-2.4.22_pre2-gss AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+ |
| 17 |
================================================== |
| 18 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 19 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
iD8DBQE/RGvXu29DXA3iCF0RAsNyAJ0cpI2IpZcQQkPxRUG/RqkLB33R3ACdEwro |
| 22 |
ecKNg1JdTY6pNOiuvooDfDI= |
| 23 |
=q6xd |
| 24 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives