Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris White <chriswhite@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] giflib and libungif hell
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 23:10:24
Message-Id: 423A067C.9040406@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] giflib and libungif hell by Michael Marineau
1 Michael Marineau wrote:
2
3 >However, somethings like qt, actually depend on BOTH packages. Does libungif
4 >actually provide something that giflib does not? Why is both needed?
5 >
6 >
7 I don't know why qt requires both in the first place. qt-3.3.3 (stable
8 on all arches) has a _builtin_ gif reader, it just tells you about the
9 LWZ patent (which.. doesn't matter because it's expired..). If you look
10 in the source tree, under src/kernel/qasyncimageio.cpp, you'll see the
11 code for the builtin image reader. Therefore, it really doesn't need any
12 at all that I can tell, but I'll leave the qt people to decide whether
13 or not they want to keep giflib in there, but as it stands, libungif go
14 bye bye.
15
16 --
17 Chris White <chriswhite@g.o>
18 ------------------------
19 Sound | Video | PPC
20 ChrisWhite @ irc.freenode.net
21 cpw @ irc.freenode.net

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] giflib and libungif hell Gregorio Guidi <greg_g@g.o>