Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:32:26
Message-Id: 46059ce10609021529q2ccf2db0k22666f295f287824@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 by Stuart Herbert
1 On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
3 > > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;)
4 >
5 > I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users.
6
7 Is it a bad thing to be saying to your developers?
8 >
9 > We didn't need 3000 more developers ... we just needed to give the
10 > developers we have more reasonable notice.
11 >
12 > This is the second time in recent weeks that we've acted like this, by
13 > stabilising a major package with little or no notice. It's the same
14 > group of folks involved both times.
15
16 The gcc-4.1 stabilization bug has been open for a month and a half.
17 Thats fairly good notice... Warnings have also appeared on
18 planet.gentoo.org, and in the GWN.
19 >
20 > Best regards,
21 > Stu
22 > --
23 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
24 >
25 >
26 --
27 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com>