| 1 |
On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert <stuart.herbert@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 9/2/06, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;) |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Is it a bad thing to be saying to your developers? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
It wasn't said to developers, it was said to a user. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> The gcc-4.1 stabilization bug has been open for a month and a half. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That's great, but that's not an announcement. Folks aren't going to |
| 15 |
go digging through bugs to find stuff like this. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> Thats fairly good notice... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Only to the folks who knew about that bug. For the wider community |
| 20 |
... it's not notice. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> Warnings have also appeared on |
| 23 |
> planet.gentoo.org, and in the GWN. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Tsunam posted that there was a push on to get gcc-4.1 stable, but |
| 26 |
there was no target date, and no firm statement that said it would |
| 27 |
definitely be happening. He posted this on July 19th. Was there |
| 28 |
another warning, with dates and stuff? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
The GWN warning was last week. My apologies if there was an earlier |
| 31 |
one that I missed. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
My apologies, but I've been unable to find an announcement on -dev. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Best regards, |
| 36 |
Stu |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives