Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:51:42
Message-Id: 20160616145126.541b7065.mgorny@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW by Fabian Groffen
1 On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:41:43 +0200
2 Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On 16-06-2016 14:26:47 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > > Hello, everyone.
6 > >
7 > > Here's my second RFC wrt bugs.gentoo.org redesign.
8 > >
9 > > Right now we have separate UNCONFIRMED and CONFIRMED states for bugs.
10 > > However, we use the two scarcely. I believe it would be beneficial to
11 > > replace the two with a single NEW state.
12 > ...
13 > > Your thoughts?
14 >
15 > How about UNRESOLVED instead? Else you get bugs which are NEW for years
16 > even though they have activity all over.
17
18 We could also use plain 'OPEN' ;-).
19
20 --
21 Best regards,
22 Michał Górny
23 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Replies