1 |
On Wednesday 30 June 2004 23:42, foser wrote: |
2 |
> As far as I am aware it is. At least EXIF was specifically designed to |
3 |
> be kept inside a JPEG format file, but I might be wrong. I mean ppl |
4 |
> stick id3 tags on everything that has music in it these days likewise. |
5 |
|
6 |
Heh. PHP supports reading exif tags from TIFF files. My testing of PHP5 |
7 |
hasn't reached the graphics stuff yet, so I can't tell you how well it works. |
8 |
|
9 |
> I was never really fan of the jpeg=exif solution, because it extends the |
10 |
> jpeg useflag beyond it's specific purpose. But I'm more worried about |
11 |
> the earlier mentioned double meaning of a USE flag we get now by your |
12 |
> interpretation. This is something that should be avoided and I hoped you |
13 |
> could take that more serious, but i guess it's just me. |
14 |
|
15 |
I'd take it more seriously if it was documented behaviour. Don't get me wrong |
16 |
- I don't doubt you about the jpeg=exif convention. But as there's no |
17 |
mention of it in the use.desc file, I'm not really sure how we expect our |
18 |
users to know that this convention exists. |
19 |
|
20 |
Best regards, |
21 |
Stu |
22 |
-- |
23 |
Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
24 |
Gentoo Developer http://www.gentoo.org/ |
25 |
http://stu.gnqs.org/diary/ |
26 |
|
27 |
GnuPG key id# F9AFC57C available from http://pgp.mit.edu |
28 |
Key fingerprint = 31FB 50D4 1F88 E227 F319 C549 0C2F 80BA F9AF C57C |
29 |
-- |