| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:44:45 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Patrick Lauer <bugs@××××××××××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> and then, from that design space, select the option(s) that have the |
| 6 |
>> best behaviour. If you get bored you can read the not-yet-GLEPs |
| 7 |
>> robbat2 has written with the help of a few others, which would cut |
| 8 |
>> out a large part of the discussion: |
| 9 |
>> http://viewcvs.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo/users/robbat2/tree-signing-gleps/ |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Uh... Which signing system did you think we were discussing when we |
| 13 |
> started talking about signing the tree? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
Well, now we agree that we talk about the same thing after only 4 email |
| 16 |
pingpongs. That is quite fast! |
| 17 |
>> But if you don't trust anyone there is no reason why you would even |
| 18 |
>> try to interact with Gentoo. So at some point you will have to decide |
| 19 |
>> to arbitrarily trust a few entities, be it devs or servers or |
| 20 |
>> cryptographic keys ... |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Uh huh, which is what my original reply to Mike was all about. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> We're way ahead of you here... |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Or so you think. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
So now that you've tried to label me as a dimwit we're past that stage |
| 30 |
and can now return to actually discussing the set of issues and how to |
| 31 |
handle them, ja? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives