| 1 |
Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> After writing a net-www/ ebuild it seemed apparent to me that we are |
| 3 |
> going to need an apache.eclass. A quick find in portage reveals quite a |
| 4 |
> few independent ebuilds all needing the basic functionality that could |
| 5 |
> be provided by an apache.eclass |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Absolutely. I'm presently maintaining a couple net-www ebuilds and found |
| 8 |
it annoying that the default HTDOCS folder was assumed. I'd rather see a |
| 9 |
unified eclass file than a kludge in every ebuild. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Most everything looks great, and I'd love to begin testing this. I've |
| 12 |
got three production and half a dozen test servers at my disposal with |
| 13 |
various combinations of Apache and Squid installed that I'd be able to |
| 14 |
toy with at the moment. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Stewart Honsberger |
| 18 |
http://blackdeath.snerk.org/ |
| 19 |
"Capitalists, by nature, organize to protect themselves. |
| 20 |
-- Geeks, by nature, resist organizaion." |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives