| 1 |
On 20 January 2013 17:09, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 20/01/13 10:39, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 3 |
>> There is no need for multiple qt categories. We want everything that |
| 4 |
>> the upstream Qt Project considers to be part of the Qt Framework to be |
| 5 |
>> in one category. Besides that there are only a handful of third-party |
| 6 |
>> extensions, such as qwt. There is no need for a separate category for |
| 7 |
>> those at this point in time. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> These are the essential modules: |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Essentials-Modules |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> and these are (or will be) the add-on modules: |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Essentials-Modules |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> So maybe "qt-base" and "qt-addon"? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
No, both the essentials and the add-ons will be in the same qt |
| 21 |
category. There is no reason to split these into different categories. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Cheers, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 27 |
Gentoo developer |
| 28 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives