| 1 |
On 20/01/13 10:39, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 20 January 2013 15:59, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Just a user with a suggestion here. Since portage already has kde-base and |
| 4 |
>> kde-misc, why not qt-base and qt-misc (and qt-something is the need arises.) |
| 5 |
>> Qt5 will have standard core modules and extensions. qt-base and qt-misc |
| 6 |
>> look like they can cover these. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> There is no need for multiple qt categories. We want everything that |
| 9 |
> the upstream Qt Project considers to be part of the Qt Framework to be |
| 10 |
> in one category. Besides that there are only a handful of third-party |
| 11 |
> extensions, such as qwt. There is no need for a separate category for |
| 12 |
> those at this point in time. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
These are the essential modules: |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Essentials-Modules |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
and these are (or will be) the add-on modules: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Essentials-Modules |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
So maybe "qt-base" and "qt-addon"? |
Archives