| 1 |
On 20 January 2013 15:59, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Just a user with a suggestion here. Since portage already has kde-base and |
| 3 |
> kde-misc, why not qt-base and qt-misc (and qt-something is the need arises.) |
| 4 |
> Qt5 will have standard core modules and extensions. qt-base and qt-misc |
| 5 |
> look like they can cover these. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
There is no need for multiple qt categories. We want everything that |
| 8 |
the upstream Qt Project considers to be part of the Qt Framework to be |
| 9 |
in one category. Besides that there are only a handful of third-party |
| 10 |
extensions, such as qwt. There is no need for a separate category for |
| 11 |
those at this point in time. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Cheers, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 17 |
Gentoo developer |
| 18 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives