| 1 |
On Thursday 18 August 2005 09:13, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> | I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That would |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> make |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> | it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making the QA tool help |
| 8 |
> | enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that line of thinking, |
| 9 |
> | please point it out in case I fall into the same trap in some other |
| 10 |
> | instance. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> OK, here's your flaw. glep.gentoo.org says it's withdrawn. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Actually, it says "SW". Instead of searching up what SW meant, I decided to |
| 15 |
look at the GLEP itself where I figured the status would be written in |
| 16 |
English. It does have a status listed but apparently it is incorrect. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Jason Stubbs |
Archives