| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
| I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That would |
| 6 |
make |
| 7 |
| it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making the QA tool help |
| 8 |
| enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that line of thinking, |
| 9 |
please |
| 10 |
| point it out in case I fall into the same trap in some other instance. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
OK, here's your flaw. glep.gentoo.org says it's withdrawn. |
| 13 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 14 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
iD8DBQFDA9K6XVaO67S1rtsRAgr/AJ9rcYfnNs+2Lq1R15+YCVKmpV6bZwCgsWK0 |
| 17 |
cGOBwYM7LW/Owfu10CmqErA= |
| 18 |
=cWiz |
| 19 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives