| 1 |
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 08:13 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> | I don't quite get you here. GLEP 31 has been approved, no? That would |
| 4 |
> make |
| 5 |
> | it seem to me that the above suggestion is just making the QA tool help |
| 6 |
> | enforce existing policy. If there's a flaw in that line of thinking, |
| 7 |
> please |
| 8 |
> | point it out in case I fall into the same trap in some other instance. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> OK, here's your flaw. glep.gentoo.org says it's withdrawn. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
it was withdrawn for the time being because it was felt that there isnt any |
| 13 |
real way to enforce it atm |
| 14 |
-mike |
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives