| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 15:05 Mon 17 Dec , Jim Ramsay (lack) wrote: |
| 3 |
> > lack 07/12/17 15:05:57 |
| 4 |
> > IUSE="+svg +video" |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> svg already defaults on for all the desktop profiles, so I'm not |
| 7 |
> really sure what that's gaining you. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Good point, removed '+' there |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > RDEPEND=">=x11-libs/gtk+-2.4 |
| 12 |
> > >=dev-libs/glib-2.2 |
| 13 |
> > >=dev-libs/libxml2-2.4.23 |
| 14 |
> > >=x11-misc/shared-mime-info-0.14 |
| 15 |
> > svg? ( gnome-base/librsvg ) |
| 16 |
> > !ppc? ( rox-base/mime-editor |
| 17 |
> > rox-base/thumbs |
| 18 |
> > video? ( rox-extra/videothumbnail ) )" |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> PPC users aren't supposed to get this stuff? If not, is it even a |
| 21 |
> real dependency? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I'm waiting on bug 201983 for ppc to keyword those ebuilds. They are |
| 24 |
semi-optional runtime dependencies. I'll explain further: |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
There are buttons in the ROX application's "options" window which |
| 27 |
launch each of these applications. Thus they are not *strictly* |
| 28 |
required for basic operation, but are required for all the buttons in |
| 29 |
the app to actually work. videothumbnail is USE-dependent because it |
| 30 |
needs either mplayer or totem, neither of which are very quick to |
| 31 |
install. The other two however (mime-editor and thumbs) are reasonably |
| 32 |
simple python apps that really only take a second or so to download and |
| 33 |
install. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
> > (cd src; make clean) > /dev/null |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> Subshells are icky. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
I agree, replaced them all with pushd/popd instead. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> > chmod 0755 "${D}/usr/bin/${WRAPPERNAME}" |
| 42 |
> > chmod 0755 "${D}/usr/bin/${WRAPPERNAME}uri" |
| 43 |
> |
| 44 |
> fperms? |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Ah yes. Done. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
> > make_desktop_entry ${WRAPPERNAME} ${APPNAME} ${APPNAME}.png |
| 49 |
> > "System;Utility;Core;ROX" |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> Thought I saw something about desktop entries dropping the suffix for |
| 52 |
> the icon, but I don't recall the details. |
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
Yes, this is correct. I have removed it. Also technically speaking |
| 55 |
there is no 'ROX' category (any more?) so I have removed it as well and |
| 56 |
made it better match the defined menu categories. |
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
-- |
| 59 |
Jim Ramsay |
| 60 |
Gentoo/Linux Developer (rox,gkrellm) |
Archives