Archives
Archives
| From: | Matthias Dahl <ml_gentoo-lists@×××××××××××××.eu> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm | ||
| Date: | Sat, 08 Nov 2014 19:02:04 | ||
| Message-Id: | 545E68A2.3030101@binary-island.eu | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | Hello Ciaran... |
| 2 | |
| 3 | On 08/11/14 19:26, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 | |
| 5 | > No. It would make sense to introduce a cultural change, where |
| 6 | > developers stop writing dependencies that seem to work with some |
| 7 | > particular version of Portage if you don't look very closely, and start |
| 8 | > writing good dependencies. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Sorry to chime in like that but if you don't mind, I'd like to ask for a |
| 11 | real-life example for badly declared dependencies with a few words why |
| 12 | those are bad and how to make them actually better? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Thanks a lot, |
| 15 | Matthias |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |