Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm | ||
| Date: | Sat, 08 Nov 2014 18:27:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20141108182659.4f17c586@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm by Hilco Wijbenga |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 8 Nov 2014 10:11:13 -0800 |
| 2 | Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 | > So would it make sense then to move to a more declarative ebuild |
| 4 | > model? Or just a "better" model? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | No. It would make sense to introduce a cultural change, where |
| 7 | developers stop writing dependencies that seem to work with some |
| 8 | particular version of Portage if you don't look very closely, and start |
| 9 | writing good dependencies. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm | Matthias Dahl <ml_gentoo-lists@×××××××××××××.eu> |