Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:51:50
Message-Id: 200410150351.26558.absinthe@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size by Seemant Kulleen
1 On Fri October 15 2004 03:20, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
2 > Actually, the trustees, in an overwhelming 12-3 vote late yesterday
3 > afternoon (UTC), decided that his assumption IS correct, and that
4 > measures should be taken immediately to rectify the cruftiness of an
5 > "amd64" keyword.  Additionally, we then pre-empt AMD's lawyers from
6 > issuing a cease-and-desist on their copywritten letters (those being
7 > capital a, capital m, and capital d in a specific order).
8
9 ok. So what will it be? x86_64? And when does this need to be changed
10 by?
11
12 --
13 Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o]
14 Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F
15
16
17 --
18 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] A few modest suggestions regarding tree size Seemant Kulleen <seemant@g.o>