| 1 |
В Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:53:56 +0100 |
| 2 |
Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> пишет: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> El dom, 12-10-2014 a las 10:38 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 5 |
> > El dom, 12-10-2014 a las 00:13 +0400, Alexander Tsoy escribió: |
| 6 |
> > [...] |
| 7 |
> > > > |
| 8 |
> > > > I think we should simply have a "keyring" USE flag to enable what most |
| 9 |
> > > > people will want -> keyring support. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > Some apps have optional support for both kwallet and gnome-keyring |
| 12 |
> > > (e.g. darktable, subversion). So I'm not sure you can leave a single |
| 13 |
> > > USE flag. |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > Maybe for them we could have an exception or review them as they also |
| 17 |
> > look to be a bit strange. For example, for concrete case of subversion |
| 18 |
> > looks like it's using gnome-keyring and "kde", that looks a bit |
| 19 |
> > inconsistent to me. We could use "gnome" and "kde" for example :/. Or |
| 20 |
> > have a "keyring" USE flag and, then "gnome" and "kde" behind that USE |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> any updates on this? :) |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I don't know anything about kwallet, but gnome-keyring is useful |
| 28 |
outside of GNOME. So I don't like the idea of hiding gnome-keyring |
| 29 |
behind "gnome" use flag. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
Alexander Tsoy |
Archives