1 |
El jue, 13-11-2014 a las 14:12 +0300, Alexander Tsoy escribió: |
2 |
> В Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:53:56 +0100 |
3 |
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> пишет: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > El dom, 12-10-2014 a las 10:38 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
6 |
> > > El dom, 12-10-2014 a las 00:13 +0400, Alexander Tsoy escribió: |
7 |
> > > [...] |
8 |
> > > > > |
9 |
> > > > > I think we should simply have a "keyring" USE flag to enable what most |
10 |
> > > > > people will want -> keyring support. |
11 |
> > > > |
12 |
> > > > Some apps have optional support for both kwallet and gnome-keyring |
13 |
> > > > (e.g. darktable, subversion). So I'm not sure you can leave a single |
14 |
> > > > USE flag. |
15 |
> > > > |
16 |
> > > |
17 |
> > > Maybe for them we could have an exception or review them as they also |
18 |
> > > look to be a bit strange. For example, for concrete case of subversion |
19 |
> > > looks like it's using gnome-keyring and "kde", that looks a bit |
20 |
> > > inconsistent to me. We could use "gnome" and "kde" for example :/. Or |
21 |
> > > have a "keyring" USE flag and, then "gnome" and "kde" behind that USE |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > > |
24 |
> > |
25 |
> > any updates on this? :) |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> |
28 |
> I don't know anything about kwallet, but gnome-keyring is useful |
29 |
> outside of GNOME. So I don't like the idea of hiding gnome-keyring |
30 |
> behind "gnome" use flag. |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
But people wanting keyring support in gnome will know need to remember |
34 |
to also enable "libsecret" (that will replace gnome-keyring at some |
35 |
point). That is the main reason for suggesting the change. That and also |
36 |
that "kde" USE flag is being used for keyring support in KDE |
37 |
environment, and that can look a bit incoherent. |
38 |
|
39 |
Having a more general "keyring" USE flag people could enable and, for |
40 |
cases with multiple support, allow to switch between providers on KDE |
41 |
and GNOME depending on their "kde" "gnome" USE flags looks to solve it |
42 |
for me :/ |