| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:12:39 +0200
|
| 5 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> This thread is derailed ... |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The argument << deprecate repositories like "gamerlay" which do not
|
| 10 |
undergo any kind of review and have low quality >> you gave causes a sub
|
| 11 |
thread that tests the reality of that argument, that is to be expected.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
It however is in no way derailing the thread; because you effectively
|
| 14 |
propose to "deprecate" it as well as highlight certain aspects to it,
|
| 15 |
if you drop your position we can all agree and no further discuss it.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Since this is a repository with 41 contributors of which 6 Gentoo
|
| 18 |
Developers, there are definitely people whom have spend a lot of work
|
| 19 |
there [1] and there are users whom use this work on a daily or weekly.
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If these people want to commit and not uphold high quality standards;
|
| 22 |
just let them do that, there is no need for review in that repository.
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
There is an alternative solution here; and that is to bring reviewed
|
| 25 |
versions of them to the Portage tree or official games repository, and
|
| 26 |
honor their contributions. That is a win-win situation for both of you.
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Don't fight overlays, but use them in the community's favor.
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
[1]: Top 10 contributors and count of commits.
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
169 Author: Azamat H. Hackimov <azamat.hackimov@×××××.com>
|
| 33 |
150 Author: Marcel Unbehaun <frostworks@×××.de>
|
| 34 |
123 Author: Christian Schmitt <chris@××××××××××.de>
|
| 35 |
99 Author: Marcel Unbehaun <marcel@×××××××××.de>
|
| 36 |
85 Author: Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov <mva@×××.name>
|
| 37 |
80 Author: Locke Shinseiko <wizzleby@×××××.com>
|
| 38 |
45 Author: Nikoli <nikoli@×××××××.com>
|
| 39 |
32 Author: krytzz <krytzz@×××××××.eu>
|
| 40 |
29 Author: Mario Kicherer <dev@××××××××.org>
|
| 41 |
20 Author: Romain Perier <mrpouet@g.o>
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Please consider that some of these people contribute in other places,
|
| 44 |
want to become Gentoo Developers or actually do want to receive review.
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
- --
|
| 47 |
With kind regards,
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
|
| 50 |
Gentoo Developer
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
|
| 53 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
|
| 54 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
|
| 55 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 56 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSZFh1AAoJEJWyH81tNOV9vA8IALifLD5jZD0LPmlrgfn/omAW
|
| 59 |
oxFM3B76oTcX7ALfwEZiq/vRyUmFC3aYZcf76CEJDd4ZYFm2ZCthPoeMHHHjtBwS
|
| 60 |
Sr/E1+ZvpvPr8VNIhu8XEAuE/dm/+t5DpezKa2nYF8LVG41+N7RRPGzlJ/d4/LGF
|
| 61 |
TXbCE4c8+ZTREFYLJdDIPp0kiyi7xNWM6KmVBJL678FWc4x6zAAEcmSk2OjUoz7h
|
| 62 |
HVLnrP1pDlVE04XcSHqCfM8WAUzJ7p6a7sQipnuiNZF7Hoxa8k6MSrEidjamt8ET
|
| 63 |
H1goNipOvBC96pG/A3/MP4lAtR01n36i2jYoVQLZKhvKssVMCORFeLcS5Uv1jbI=
|
| 64 |
=I7ia
|
| 65 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives