Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL-2 vs GPL-2+
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:10:14
Message-Id: 458C56E8.2000108@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL-2 vs GPL-2+ by Yuri Vasilevski
1 Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100
5 > "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> wrote:
6 >
7 >> At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU General
8 >> Public License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be sure it's
9 >> alright to license it to "any later version". Linux kernel for
10 >> instance is licensed _only_ under GPLv2, but not any later version.
11 >
12 > I don't think this is a good solution, as in any case the package is
13 > licensed under GPL-2, so how about for the packages that only support
14 > GPL-2 we set:
15 >
16 > LICENSE="GPL-2"
17 >
18 > While for the ones that support v2 or later (this is actually a special
19 > case of multiple licensing) we do:
20 >
21 > LICENSE="GPL-2 GPL-3"
22
23 If you meant:
24
25 LICENSE=" || ( GPL-2 GPL-3 )"
26
27 then I agree ;)
28
29 It would be under Either the GPL-2 OR a later version, not both, yes?
30
31 -Alec Warner
32
33 --
34 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL-2 vs GPL-2+ Yuri Vasilevski <yvasilev@g.o>