1 |
Yuri Vasilevski wrote: |
2 |
> Hi, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100 |
5 |
> "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU General |
8 |
>> Public License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be sure it's |
9 |
>> alright to license it to "any later version". Linux kernel for |
10 |
>> instance is licensed _only_ under GPLv2, but not any later version. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> I don't think this is a good solution, as in any case the package is |
13 |
> licensed under GPL-2, so how about for the packages that only support |
14 |
> GPL-2 we set: |
15 |
> |
16 |
> LICENSE="GPL-2" |
17 |
> |
18 |
> While for the ones that support v2 or later (this is actually a special |
19 |
> case of multiple licensing) we do: |
20 |
> |
21 |
> LICENSE="GPL-2 GPL-3" |
22 |
|
23 |
If you meant: |
24 |
|
25 |
LICENSE=" || ( GPL-2 GPL-3 )" |
26 |
|
27 |
then I agree ;) |
28 |
|
29 |
It would be under Either the GPL-2 OR a later version, not both, yes? |
30 |
|
31 |
-Alec Warner |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |