| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100 |
| 4 |
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU General |
| 7 |
> Public License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be sure it's |
| 8 |
> alright to license it to "any later version". Linux kernel for |
| 9 |
> instance is licensed _only_ under GPLv2, but not any later version. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I don't think this is a good solution, as in any case the package is |
| 12 |
licensed under GPL-2, so how about for the packages that only support |
| 13 |
GPL-2 we set: |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
LICENSE="GPL-2" |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
While for the ones that support v2 or later (this is actually a special |
| 18 |
case of multiple licensing) we do: |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
LICENSE="GPL-2 GPL-3" |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
when it becomes available? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Best, |
| 25 |
Yuri. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives