| 1 |
Wernfried Haas <amne@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote: |
| 3 |
> > and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death |
| 4 |
> > penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or |
| 5 |
> > into the open flame, only conservapedia is real,... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> This certainly is an interesting first post to the Gentoo development |
| 8 |
> list, not sure if it's pure trolling or just a joke gone bad. In any |
| 9 |
> way, this is not exactly Gentoo development related and not really CoC |
| 10 |
> [1] compliant. Please read the CoC before posting again. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Yeah, see... There's the problem with the CoCk. It's a generic |
| 13 |
catch-all. "I didn't like that, therefore you're evil." Perfect example: |
| 14 |
You took a friendly bit of sarcasm as being offensive, and you're using |
| 15 |
the CoCk as justification for your objection thereto. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
So, there are a few possibilities here. Either your English skills need |
| 18 |
polishing, or you did so deliberately, or you could possibly be drunk. |
| 19 |
If the former of the three, ignore this and keep practicing; you'll get |
| 20 |
better. If the middle one, you're broken; you'll either ignore this and |
| 21 |
dismiss me as ignorant, or throw a hissy-fit and try to hurt me in any |
| 22 |
way you can. If the latter of the three, party on; it's Friday. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> Everyone else, please don't reply to this subthread as well for the |
| 25 |
> same reasons. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Speaking of theology, isn't that a bit hypocritical: to reply, but |
| 28 |
suggest that nobody else does? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
"Such things have often happened and still happen, |
| 32 |
and how can these be signs of the end of the world?" |
| 33 |
-- Julian, Emperor of Rome 361-363 A.D. |
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives