From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Looking for a generic solution to non-USE-conditional circular deps | ||
Date: | Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:49:37 | ||
Message-Id: | 20150413174913.77d7c541@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Looking for a generic solution to non-USE-conditional circular deps by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> |
1 | On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 06:36:44 +0000 (UTC) |
2 | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
3 | > What about "initial-build" for the flag name, and making it part of |
4 | > the next EAPI, such that PMs know how to handle it without involving |
5 | > the user having to set it, and indeed, actually ignore the flag (as a |
6 | > masked flag) in normal operation if the user /does/ set it? |
7 | |
8 | You haven't thought your cunning plan all the way through. What if |
9 | cmake is installed but broken and needing a revdep-rebuild? |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-dev] Re: Looking for a generic solution to non-USE-conditional circular deps | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |