| 1 |
On 17/01/15 18:43, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi everyone, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> It looks like there aren't too many bugs against gcc-4.9 (bug #495124). |
| 5 |
> There are a couple having to do with lto and one which is hardened |
| 6 |
> specific, but its probably a good idea to start keywording on the |
| 7 |
> various arches so we can get more bug reports and not trail behind. So |
| 8 |
> I opened bug #536874. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> I've followed Ryan's workflow where he has one bug for gcc 4.9 porting |
| 11 |
> and another for keywording/stabilization. I'm not sure why he did it |
| 12 |
> this way, but it may be less confusing in the future to have just one |
| 13 |
> which track the state of the ebuild from keyword masked, to keyworded to |
| 14 |
> stabilization. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> @rhill, any advice here :) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Word of warning, asan was still terminally broken on nontrivial code |
| 21 |
last time I tested it. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
lu |
Archives